AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1138 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 302.4 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 9,677 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 210 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 11823
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 828 vs 687
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61716 vs 40088
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 vs 5 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel / s vs 285.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 11823 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 vs 687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61716 vs 40088 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13107 vs 12822
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13107 vs 12822
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13107 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13107 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 11823 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 | 687 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61716 | 40088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12822 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12822 | 13107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | GM200 |
Launch date | 14 August 2017 | 5 March 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $4,999 |
Place in performance rating | 242 | 245 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1138 MHz | 988 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | 6,844 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 3072 |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel / s | 285.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 8,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |