AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 948 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 2058.4x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 8192 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98432 vs 37998
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 471
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 10377
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 10 November 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 948 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 vs 37998 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 471 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 10377 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98432 | 37998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 471 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 10377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | GM200 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 10 November 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 161 | 245 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 948 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |