AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 1146.6x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 11029
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 11029
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 vs 588
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15597 vs 10972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 11029 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 vs 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 vs 10972 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3100
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3100
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 475 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3100 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3100 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99500 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15597 | 10972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 174 | 171 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
