AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon HD 7990
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon HD 7990 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 57.9x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 88.665
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1753.494
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 8.437
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 88.328
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 434.598
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 6689
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 6689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 24 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 88.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1753.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 8.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 88.328 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 434.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 6689 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7990
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1408
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1408 |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7990
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 88.665 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1753.494 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 8.437 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 88.328 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 434.598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 6689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5566 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Malta |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 24 April 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $999 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 412 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Price now | $1,126.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.87 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2x 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 307 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
