AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- 1552.5x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3575
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 179.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 729
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7847 vs 7351
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 729 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7847 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 807 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 7847 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38420 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 597.677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10320 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10320 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 10 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 326 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Price now | $539.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |