AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 1447.4x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2000x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3700
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3700
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3343
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3343
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3343 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
- 2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1536
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 834 vs 729
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12929 vs 7351
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 834 vs 729 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12929 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3343 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 834 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 12929 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.225 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 518.554 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9834 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9834 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | GM200 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 17 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 324 | 327 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 192 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,691 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |