AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 980 MHz
• 2531x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1344
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3627
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3627
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 729 vs 694
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7351 vs 5427

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

• Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 205 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 3627
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 3354
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	729 694
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7351 5427

Compare specifications (specs)