AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 1697.6x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 916 vs 747
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15026 vs 7580
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70165 vs 43046
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11065 vs 9143
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11065 vs 9143
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 916 vs 747 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15026 vs 7580 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70165 vs 43046 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3718
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3718
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3360
- 9.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 32085 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 916 | 747 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15026 | 7580 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70165 | 43046 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 9143 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 106.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1878.403 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 201 | 203 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |