AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1645 MHz
703.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 909 vs 724
Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70274 vs 64134

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	19 Nov 2019 vs 1 October 2016
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz vs 1645 MHz
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	205 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	909 vs 724
Geekbench - OpenCL	70274 vs 64134

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15387 vs 14812
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11065
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11065

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1506 MHz vs 1243 MHz
Pipelines	3840 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	15387 vs 14812
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20035 vs 11065
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20035 vs 11065

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3715

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3356

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

909

724

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14812

15387

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

70274

64134

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

20035

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11065

20035

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	909	724
PassMark - G3D Mark	14812	15387
Geekbench - OpenCL	70274	64134
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11065	20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11065	20035
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		545.751
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		8770

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W5700	NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Pascal
Code name	Navi 10	GP102
Launch date	19 Nov 2019	1 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$5,999
Place in performance rating	210	209
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Price now		$4,403.52
Value for money (0-100)		3.90
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1930 MHz	1645 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	555.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	17.79 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	8.893 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3840
Pixel fill rate	123.5 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	277.9 GTexel/s	394.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	205 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	11,800 million
Floating-point performance		12,634 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	12 inches (305 mm)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1 x 8-pin
Width	Dual-slot	2" (5.1 cm)
SLI options		1
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	9016 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	384 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management