NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and AMD Radeon Pro W5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 966 vs 913
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 19 Nov 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 966 vs 913 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14848 vs 11905
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69320 vs 60568
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 126.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14848 vs 11905 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69320 vs 60568 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 966 | 913 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11905 | 14848 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 60568 | 69320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.741 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2525.787 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.152 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 19 Nov 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 206 | 208 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 126.4 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 205 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | 10300 million |
Compute units | 36 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 12 inches (305 mm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |