AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1930 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 723.7x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 909 vs 731
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14812 vs 12285
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70274 vs 66605
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 909 vs 731 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14812 vs 12285 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70274 vs 66605 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 11065
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 11065
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 11065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 11065 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3336 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 909 | 731 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14812 | 12285 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70274 | 66605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11065 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11065 | 13848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 19 Nov 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 210 | 207 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1930 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.893 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 5x mini-DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |