AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43810 vs 34842
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 9258
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 9258
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 661
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 7711
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 vs 34842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3351 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 661 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 7711 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 34842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3351 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 661 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 7711 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 15 October 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 146 | 335 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |