AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 596.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 15401
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 15401
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 919
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 15401 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 919 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 vs 43810
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3364
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3364
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 vs 17591
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 vs 43810 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3364 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 vs 17591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 155548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 4193 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 919 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 19673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Volta |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 7 December 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 156 | 157 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |