AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 596.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 205 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 15401
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 15401
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 862
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 465.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 15401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 862 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 156591 vs 43810
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3364
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3364
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19743 vs 17591
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 156591 vs 43810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3364 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19743 vs 17591 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 156591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 4193 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 862 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 19743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3583.136 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.669 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Volta |
Code name | Navi 10 | GV100 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 7 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 149 | 151 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |