AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43810 vs 39420
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 10959
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 10959
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 577
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 7878
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 vs 39420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 577 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 7878 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1243 MHz
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 39420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 577 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 7878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU107 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 146 | 359 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
