AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 15914
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 15914
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2002
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2002
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 vs 1819
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 1819
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 13 September 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 15914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 15914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 2002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 2002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 1819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 1819 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65419 vs 42835
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65419 vs 42835 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42835 | 65419 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 15914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 15914 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 2002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 2002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 1819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 1819 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 13 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 167 | 134 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDFireStream 9270
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
