AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 14076
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 14076
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1976
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3364 vs 1781
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3364 vs 1781
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 592
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 10616
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 10000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 vs 1781 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 10616 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 43810
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 43810 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43810 | 61276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3364 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3364 | 1781 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 | 592 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 | 10616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
Launch date | Q3'2020 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 156 | 270 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.5 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |