AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD ROG Ally Extreme
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6300M and AMD ROG Ally Extreme videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6300M
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1512 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1512 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the AMD ROG Ally Extreme
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 2700 MHz vs 2040 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 129.6 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 vs 19 Jan 2022 |
Boost clock speed | 2700 MHz vs 2040 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 129.6 GTexel/s vs 97.92 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6300M
GPU 2: AMD ROG Ally Extreme
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6300M | AMD ROG Ally Extreme |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2837 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M | AMD ROG Ally Extreme | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 24 | Phoenix |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 13 Jun 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 870 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | 2700 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | 12 |
Core clock speed | 1512 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.28 GPixel/s | 86.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 97.92 GTexel/s | 129.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 25390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 21 mm, 0.8 inches | |
Length | 280 mm, 11 inches | |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.00 GB/s | 51.20 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 32 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5 |