AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 160x more pipelines: 3840 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 65 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 9 January 2008 |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 256 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
- 16x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 400 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2243 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2243 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 125290 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 320 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 104 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | |
Code name | Navi 21 | MCP79Mx + NB9M |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 9 January 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4999 | |
Place in performance rating | 503 | 506 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1975 MHz | |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 948.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.34 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.6 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 474.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 |