AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6800X and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 706 MHz
- 3392.4x more texture fill rate: 498.0 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s
- Around 54% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 5 GB
- 7.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123773 vs 16085
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 5 January 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s vs 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 2496 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123773 vs 16085 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 400 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3723
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3723
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3360
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7337 vs 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7337 vs 3723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10873 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10873 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | NVIDIA Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 7337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 7337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 10873 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 10873 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123773 | 16085 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4432 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 210 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.755 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.303 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 83.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.291 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8319 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W6800X | NVIDIA Tesla K20m | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Navi 21 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 5 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 428 | 414 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2075 MHz | |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 996.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 31.87 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.94 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 199.2 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 498.0 GTexel/s | 146.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,524 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Quad-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 208.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W6800X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000M
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDRadeon R9 280
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDFirePro W7170M
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
AMDRadeon Pro V340 MxGPU
AMDRadeon Pro W6800X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
