AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6900X and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2150 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 1990.7x more texture fill rate: 688.0 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1572 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 151605 vs 71252
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3739 vs 3709
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3739 vs 3709
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s vs 345.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 vs 71252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 vs 3709 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 W |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 151605 | 71252 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3739 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3739 | 3709 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12920 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 797 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 3 Aug 2021 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 233 | 231 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2150 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,376 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 44.03 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 22.02 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 275.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 688.0 GTexel/s | 345.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.14x Thunderbolt | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Quad-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 W | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | 120 mm 4.7 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |