AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 121.6 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 1792 vs 384
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 3,892 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5579 vs 3362
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5579 vs 3362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 November 2016 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 vs 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 vs 3362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 713 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1565
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 1691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1565
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 713 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 1691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1565 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5584 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 777 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1362.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.025 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 106.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 250.267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5579 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1691 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1565 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5579 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1691 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1565 | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Ellesmere | GF114 |
| Launch date | 18 November 2016 | 8 March 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 470 | 471 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1086 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 713 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,892 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 121.6 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20
