AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 993 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 965 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4271 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Vega 10 | GM108 |
Launch date | 3 December 2017 | 17 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 904 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 965 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |