AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 610 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 12650
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 595
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 vs 12650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 595 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 188 Watt vs 230 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13932 | 12650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 | 595 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | GT200B |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 84 |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 188 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |