Apple M1 Max 24-core vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of Apple M1 Max 24-core and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M1 Max 24-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 14 nm
- 23x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25004 vs 13044
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25004 vs 13044
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7440 vs 7164
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7440 vs 7164
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25004 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25004 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 vs 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 vs 7164 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 69365 vs 66294
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 6721
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 6721
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69365 vs 66294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 6721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 6721 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M1 Max 24-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Apple M1 Max 24-core | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66294 | 69365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25004 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25004 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7440 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7440 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6721 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6721 | 30936 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13527 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 801 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M1 Max 24-core | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 26 Oct 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 126 | 127 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | |
Code name | Vega 10 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.962 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Render output units | 96 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 230 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 512 bit | |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 |