NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 64% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 13044
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 13044
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16213 vs 13169
- Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 112595 vs 69537
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 13044 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16213 vs 13169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 112595 vs 69537 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3711
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3711
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3356
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3356
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 780 vs 627
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 780 vs 627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 13044 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 780 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16213 | 13169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 112595 | 69537 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GA104 | Vega 10 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 120 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |