AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
vs
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 11451
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3555
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3198
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 11451
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3555
- 9.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1246 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 157192 vs 69103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 157192 vs 69103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14039 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 69103 | 157192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13044 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13044 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 | 3198 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Volta |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 39 | 156 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1246 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 5120 | |
| Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 with others
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
