AMD Radeon R2 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 7750

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 7750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R2 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 375 vs 305
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 375 vs 305

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7750

• 4.6x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
• 4.6x better floating-point performance: 819.2 gflops vs 179.2 gflops
• 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 vs 250
• 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 67
• 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 vs 2.751
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 vs 93.854
• 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 vs 0.263
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 vs 6.299
• 6.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 vs 16.121
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1439 vs 1282
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 vs 1912
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1439 vs 1282
• Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 vs 1912

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	250 1693
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	67 427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.751 21.658
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	93.854 566.052
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.263 2.182
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.299 37.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.121 98.126
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 3295
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	375 305
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1282 1439
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1912 3295

Compare specifications (specs)