AMD Radeon R2 Graphics versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R2 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 375 versus 305
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 375 versus 305
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 versus 305 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 25.6 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 128
- 4.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 819.2 gflops versus 179.2 gflops
- 6.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1693 versus 250
- 6.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 versus 67
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 2.751
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 93.854
- 8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 0.263
- 5.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 6.299
- 6.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 16.121
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1439 versus 1282
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 versus 1912
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1439 versus 1282
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 versus 1912
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.6 GTexel / s versus 5.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 128 |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops versus 179.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1693 versus 250 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 versus 67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 2.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 93.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 0.263 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 6.299 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 16.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1439 versus 1282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 versus 1912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1439 versus 1282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 versus 1912 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 | 1693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 427 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.751 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 93.854 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.263 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.299 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.121 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 375 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1282 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1912 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 375 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1282 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1912 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Beema | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 27 February 2015 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1589 | 1128 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 179.2 gflops | 819.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 128 | 512 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5.6 GTexel / s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 930 million | 1,500 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R2 Graphics avec des autres
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6600 GT
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9600 GT
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
ATIRadeon HD 4650
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
AMDRadeon R5 220 OEM
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 705 OEM
AMDRadeon R2 Graphics vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720
