AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 2188
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 2188
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 1 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 2188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 967 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.47 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1696 vs 1681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1696 vs 1681
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.47 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1334 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1696 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1696 vs 1681 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 1696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 1696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 2188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 2188 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3763 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1585 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Caicos | GK208 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 1 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1151 | 1152 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 967 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 15.47 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 168 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |