Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 3290
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 vs 21 December 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1681 vs 1514
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1681 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1357 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6586 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Caicos |
Launch date | 3 January 2017 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1153 | 1155 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |