AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 9 January 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1334 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3520 vs 1681
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3520 vs 1681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3290
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 1334 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3520 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3520 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3290 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1681 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1681 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3334 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1327 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 246 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4265 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Caicos | GK107 |
| Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 9 January 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1145 | 1147 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 160 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 370 million | 1,270 million |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920A
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
