AMD Radeon R5 230 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 218
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 1561
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 April 2014 vs 7 February 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 255 vs 218
Geekbench - OpenCL 4127 vs 1561

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570

  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 480 vs 160
  • 3.1x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
  • 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 222
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 439
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 439
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 992
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 992
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2480
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2480
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 480 vs 160
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 559 vs 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1296 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1296 vs 439
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1044 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1044 vs 992
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2716 vs 2480
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2716 vs 2480

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
222
559
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
255
218
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4127
1561
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
439
1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
439
1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
992
1044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
992
1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2480
2716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2480
2716
Name AMD Radeon R5 230 AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark 222 559
PassMark - G2D Mark 255 218
Geekbench - OpenCL 4127 1561
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 439 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 439 1296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 992 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 992 1044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2480 2716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2480 2716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 255.525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 59.183
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 846

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 230 AMD Radeon HD 6570

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 TeraScale 2
Code name Caicos Thames
Design AMD Radeon R5 200 Series AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series
Launch date 3 April 2014 7 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1319 1426
Price now $50 $49.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 6.10 19.92
Launch price (MSRP) $79

Technical info

Floating-point performance 200.0 gflops 624.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 160 480
Texture fill rate 5 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 370 million 716 million
Boost clock speed 650 MHz
Stream Processors 480

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 1.0 x4 PCIe 2.1 x16
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors N / A None

API support

DirectX 11 11
OpenGL 4.4 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 10.67 GB / s 28.8 GB/s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 900 MHz

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
​PowerPlay
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)