AMD Radeon R5 230 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 230 and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 218
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4127 vs 1561
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 vs 7 February 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 vs 1561 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 480 vs 160
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 222
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1296 vs 439
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 439
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1044 vs 992
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 992
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2480
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2480
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 2480 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 230 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 222 | 559 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 | 218 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4127 | 1561 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 439 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 439 | 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 992 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 992 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 | 2716 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 230 | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Caicos | Thames |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
Launch date | 3 April 2014 | 7 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1319 | 1426 |
Price now | $50 | $49.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | 19.92 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Technical info |
||
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 716 million |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 10.67 GB / s | 28.8 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |