AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 230 MHz
  • 2.8x more boost clock speed: 780 MHz vs 280 MHz
  • 160x more pipelines: 320 vs 2
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
  • 64x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 32 MB
  • 4.9x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 366 MHz
  • 137x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 548 vs 4
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 103
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 November 2013 vs 1 December 2001
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 230 MHz
Boost clock speed 780 MHz vs 280 MHz
Pipelines 320 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 150 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 32 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 366 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 548 vs 4
PassMark - G2D Mark 194 vs 103

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

  • 35.9x more texture fill rate: 560 MTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 85% lower typical power consumption: 27 Watt vs 50 Watt
Texture fill rate 560 MTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 27 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
548
4
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
194
103
Name AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM ATI Mobility Radeon 7500
PassMark - G3D Mark 548 4
PassMark - G2D Mark 194 103
Geekbench - OpenCL 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2264

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM ATI Mobility Radeon 7500

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Rage 7
Code name Oland M7
Launch date 1 November 2013 1 December 2001
Place in performance rating 1406 1378
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 780 MHz 280 MHz
Core clock speed 730 MHz 230 MHz
Floating-point performance 499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 150 nm
Pipelines 320 2
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s 560 MTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 27 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 60 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 AGP 4x
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 7.0
OpenGL 4.5 1.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 3.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 200 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 366 MHz
Memory type DDR3 64 / 128
Shared memory 0