AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 6.992 GTexel / s
• 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
• 3x better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1650 MHz
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 352
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 189
• 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4949 vs 1345
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 2.857
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 629
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1102
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 629
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1102

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 874 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2918 vs 2264
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2918 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 352
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4949 1345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 2.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1102
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2918
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 629
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1102
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2918

Compare specifications (specs)