AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
  • Around 27% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 4922
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 162.886
  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.009
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 19.668
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1119
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 2264
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1119
  • Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 2264
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 May 2014 vs 1 November 2013
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed 825 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 320
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 546 vs 544
Geekbench - OpenCL 5587 vs 4922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 282.111 vs 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.455 vs 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.704 vs 19.668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1551 vs 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2424 vs 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1551 vs 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2424 vs 2264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

  • Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 138
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 12.031
  • Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 68.392
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1264
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1264
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 193 vs 138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.569 vs 12.031
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 77.819 vs 68.392
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1284 vs 1264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1284 vs 1264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
546
544
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
138
193
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5587
4922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.031
13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
282.111
162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.455
1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
21.704
19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
68.392
77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1551
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1264
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2424
2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1551
1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1264
1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2424
2264
Name AMD Radeon R7 M265 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 546 544
PassMark - G2D Mark 138 193
Geekbench - OpenCL 5587 4922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.031 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 282.111 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.455 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.704 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 68.392 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1551 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1264 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2424 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1551 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1264 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2424 2264

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 M265 AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Topaz Oland
Design AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch date 20 May 2014 1 November 2013
Place in performance rating 1415 1416
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 825 MHz 780 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 900 MHz 730 MHz
Floating-point performance 633.6 gflops 499.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 320
Texture fill rate 19.8 GTexel / s 15.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 3,100 million 1,040 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size medium sized
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_1)
Mantle
OpenCL Not Listed
OpenGL 4.4 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB/s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PCIe 3.0
PowerTune
Switchable graphics
Zero Core
ZeroCore