AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 27% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 4947
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 162.886
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.009
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 19.668
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1119
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 2264
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1119
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 2264
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 vs 1 November 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 vs 544 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 vs 4947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 vs 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 vs 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 vs 19.668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 vs 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 vs 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 vs 2264 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 193 vs 138
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 12.031
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 68.392
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1264
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1264
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 193 vs 138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 vs 12.031 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 vs 68.392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1284 vs 1264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1284 vs 1264 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 546 | 544 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 | 193 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5587 | 4947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.031 | 13.569 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 282.111 | 162.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.455 | 1.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.704 | 19.668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 68.392 | 77.819 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1551 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1264 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2424 | 2264 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1551 | 1119 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1264 | 1284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2424 | 2264 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M265 | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Topaz | Oland |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1413 | 1414 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 780 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 730 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,040 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |