AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M265 and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M265

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 825 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 19.8 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 633.6 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 546 vs 538
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5587 vs 5166
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 282.111 vs 162.886
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.455 vs 1.009
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.704 vs 19.668
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1551 vs 1119
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2424 vs 2264
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1551 vs 1119
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2424 vs 2264

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 192 vs 138
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 12.031
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 68.392
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1284 vs 1264
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1284 vs 1264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 538
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	138 192
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5587 5166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.031 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	282.111 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.455 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.704 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	68.392 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1551 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1264 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2424 2264

Compare specifications (specs)