AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
• Around 53% better floating-point performance: 499.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4949 vs 1744
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 4.636
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.886 vs 115.549
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.009 vs 0.454
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.668 vs 7.024
• 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 10.485

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 775 vs 546
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 249 vs 194
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1162 vs 1119
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1695 vs 1284
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2297 vs 2264
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1162 vs 1119
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1695 vs 1284
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2297 vs 2264

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	546 775
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	194 249
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4949 1744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.569 4.636
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.886 115.549
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.009 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.668 7.024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	77.819 10.485
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2297
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1119 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1284 1695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2264 2297

Compare specifications (specs)