AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
- Around 35% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 26 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 595.2 gflops |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5862 vs 5232
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1106
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1106
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 1841
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5862 vs 5232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1734 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1734 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5232 | 5862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Mars |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 26 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1295 | 1298 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce3 Ti500
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1300
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8750M
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
