AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
2.1x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5287 vs 1993
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 3195
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 3195

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	806.4 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5287 vs 1993
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3260 vs 3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3260 vs 3195

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Around 9% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz
2.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1123 vs 1106
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1123 vs 1106
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 1841
Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 1841

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1123 vs 1106
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1123 vs 1106
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2253 vs 1841
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2253 vs 1841

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5287

1993

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1106

1123

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1106

1123

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1841

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1841

2253

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3260

3195

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3260

3195

Name	AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Geekbench - OpenCL	5287	1993
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1106	1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1106	1123
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1841	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1841	2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3260	3195
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3260	3195
PassMark - G3D Mark		718
PassMark - G2D Mark		219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		182.093
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		20.881

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM	NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Oland	GK208
Launch date	5 May 2015	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1296	1298
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$229.99
Price now		$75
Value for money (0-100)		11.43
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	806.4 gflops	376.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s	15.68 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	1270 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	20.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus