AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 240
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and AMD Radeon R7 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 62% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 499.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 240
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5331 vs 5150
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1688 vs 1106
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1688 vs 1106
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2342 vs 1841
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2342 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5331 vs 5150 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1688 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1688 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2342 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2342 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 240
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 5331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 1688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 2342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 902 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 290.632 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 60.326 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | AMD Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Oland | Oland |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1236 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $69 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 24.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
| Stream Processors | 320 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | N / A |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 72 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9250
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8510G
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820A
