AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
2.2x better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
4000x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5150 vs 1946
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 977
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 977
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1841 vs 1494
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1841 vs 1494
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3260 vs 1833
Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3260 vs 1833

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 27 March 2014
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 192
Floating-point performance	806.4 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5150 vs 1946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1106 vs 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1106 vs 977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1841 vs 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1841 vs 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3260 vs 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3260 vs 1833

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 900 MHz
3.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 65 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB

Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 900 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5150

1946

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1106

977

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1106

977

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1841

1494

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1841

1494

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3260

1833

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3260

1833

Name	AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Geekbench - OpenCL	5150	1946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1106	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1106	977
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1841	1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1841	1494
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3260	1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3260	1833
PassMark - G3D Mark		623
PassMark - G2D Mark		212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		6.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		100.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.441
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.146
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		20.64
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		192

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Oland	GK208B
Launch date	5 May 2015	27 March 2014
Place in performance rating	1281	1488
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$34.99
Price now		$34.99
Value for money (0-100)		23.15
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	900 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	806.4 gflops	366.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	192
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s	15.26 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	19 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	292 million
CUDA cores		192
Maximum GPU temperature		95 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Height		2.713" (6.9 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
PhysX
PureVideo