AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 17% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 116 Watt
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 15 March 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 5150
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1106
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1106
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1841
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1841
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 3260
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 5150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 1106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5150 | 5750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1841 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1841 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3322 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GF116 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 15 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1281 | 1019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 116 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1026 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |