AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 499.2 gflops
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 548
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 194
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 4936
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 162.886
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 1.009
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.668
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1119
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1284
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1119
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1284

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 vs 12.111
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 vs 73.506
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 vs 1677
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 548
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 4936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 13.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 162.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 1.009
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 19.668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 77.819
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 2264
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1119
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 1284
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 2264

Compare specifications (specs)