AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM versus AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.72 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 599.0 gflops versus 499.2 gflops
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 versus 548
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 versus 194
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 versus 4936
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 versus 162.886
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 versus 1.009
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 19.668
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 versus 1119
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 versus 1284
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 versus 1119
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 versus 1284
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 1 November 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops versus 499.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 versus 548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 versus 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 versus 4936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 versus 162.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 versus 1.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 19.668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 versus 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 versus 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 versus 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 versus 1284 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.569 versus 12.111
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.819 versus 73.506
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2264 versus 1677
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2264 versus 1677
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 versus 12.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 versus 73.506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2264 versus 1677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2264 versus 1677 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 548 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 194 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 4936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 13.569 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 162.886 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 1.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 19.668 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 77.819 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 2264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 2264 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Oland | Oland |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 1 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1199 | 1406 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 499.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |

