AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 283

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 250

• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 22.4 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 716.8 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1051 vs 896
• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7525 vs 5684
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.161 vs 12.111
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 304.279 vs 253.178
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.655 vs 1.211
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.046 vs 23.777
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 96.934 vs 73.506
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2179 vs 1645
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3170 vs 2426
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1677
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2179 vs 1645
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3170 vs 2426
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 1051
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 283
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 7525
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 20.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 304.279
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 1.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 30.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 96.934
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 2179
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3356

Compare specifications (specs)