AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
• 3.7x more texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 12x better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 50 gflops
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 630
• Around 77% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 3210
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 8.844
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 171.17
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 1.115
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 10.385
• 5.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 12.361
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 988
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1702
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 988
• Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1702

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 780 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 304
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2808 vs 1677
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2808 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 2808

Compare specifications (specs)