AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 530

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 49% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 254
• Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 4397
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.781
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 30.177
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 1045
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 2393
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 1045
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 2393

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 530

• Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 32x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 896
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.747 vs 12.111
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 330.464 vs 253.178
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.804 vs 1.211
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1677
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1677

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 530

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	896 995
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 254
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5684 4397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.111 30.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	253.178 330.464
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.211 1.804
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23.777 19.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	73.506 30.177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1645 1045
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2426 2393
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1677 3346

Compare specifications (specs)