AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 599.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 1800x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 vs 623
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 212
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 vs 1946
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 vs 6.705
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 vs 100.391
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 vs 0.441
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 8.146
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 20.64
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 vs 977
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 vs 1494
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 vs 977
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 vs 1494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 27 March 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 vs 1494 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1677
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1677
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Oland | GK208B |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1199 | 1488 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |