AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 18.72 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- Environ 64% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 599.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 1800x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 896 versus 623
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 versus 212
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5684 versus 1946
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.111 versus 6.705
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 versus 100.391
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.211 versus 0.441
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 8.146
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 versus 20.64
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1645 versus 977
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2426 versus 1494
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1645 versus 977
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2426 versus 1494
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 27 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 versus 1494 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 730 MHz
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 versus 1677
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 1677 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | Oland | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1199 | 1488 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 780 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |