AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 15.363
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 22 July 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 15.363 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 vs 896
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 304
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 vs 5684
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 vs 12.111
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 vs 253.178
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 vs 1.211
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.125 vs 73.506
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1645
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 vs 2426
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 vs 1677
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1645
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 vs 2426
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 vs 1677
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 780 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 599.0 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 vs 896 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 vs 304 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 vs 5684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 vs 12.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 vs 253.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 vs 1.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 vs 73.506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 vs 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 vs 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 1677 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 vs 1645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 vs 2426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 1677 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 2220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 480 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5684 | 6869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.111 | 22.112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 | 297.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.211 | 1.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 | 15.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 | 99.125 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | 2490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Oland | GM107 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 22 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1199 | 953 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
| Price now | $189.93 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 18.72 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 41 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 160 mm | |
| Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | 128 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
