AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 400x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7050 vs 4486
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3332
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3332
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 27 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 vs 4486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3332 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1430
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1430
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1843
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1843
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 223
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1751 vs 851
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.9 billion / sec vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 812.5 gflops vs 659.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 vs 1430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 vs 1843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 vs 1843 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 vs 223 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1751 vs 851 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 | 4486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1430 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1430 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1843 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1843 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 | 3332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 368 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 | 1751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hainan | GK106 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 27 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1026 | 1029 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $144.81 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |