AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 920MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7050 vs 3912
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 151
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 25 March 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 965 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 vs 3912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 151 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1430
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1430
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1843
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1843
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1080 vs 851
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1843 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1080 vs 851 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 | 3912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1430 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1430 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1843 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1843 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 151 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 | 1080 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Hainan | GM108 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 25 March 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1019 | 1035 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 602.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 16 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4400
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8280 IGP
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E8860
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
IntelHD Graphics P630
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile
