AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 920MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 965 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 320 vs 256
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 659.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7050 vs 3951
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5002 vs 3358
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 149
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 25 March 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 965 MHz |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 vs 3951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 149 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1430
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1430
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1843
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1843
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1073 vs 851
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1430 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1843 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 vs 851 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7050 | 3951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1430 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1430 | 1764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1843 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1843 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5002 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5002 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 149 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 851 | 1073 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Hainan | GM108 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 25 March 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1026 | 1027 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | 602.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 320 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.6 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 16 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 420
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
ATIFireGL X1-256
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5600
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
AMDRadeon E8860
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920MX
